published April 28, 2011
in the Stockton Sentinel
Stockton, Kansas
In the news recently, a couple of
Kansas towns have dealt with the issue of defining a “companion animal.” Most
towns have ordinances on what kinds of animals can or cannot be kept inside
city limits. I don’t know what the ordinances in the city of Stockton allow or
prohibit, but as director of Stockton Housing Authority, I know our own
definitions and rules allow cats or small dogs, less than 20 pounds. Snakes,
reptiles, rabbits, ferrets, rodents and insects are not permitted under any
circumstances.
At every housing conference I
attend, the subject of “companion animals” comes up, one way or another. I am
attending another conference this week, and I expect it to be a hot topic
again, right up there with bed bugs – which, by the way, are companion animals
of the most unwelcome kind, no matter how cute you might think they are!
Recently the mayor in the city of
Oberlin had to break a tie vote between his council members as to whether a woman
could keep her seven-foot pet boa constrictor. A great amount of time was spent
in deliberation, even though the city ordinance – which specifically lists 28
prohibited animals – includes constrictor snakes. The list also includes other
perfectly lovable creatures such as gorillas, crocodiles, elephants,
hippopotami, lions, rhinoceroses, skunks and tigers, among others. The mayor
bravely said “no,” so the snake must go.
Earlier this month, officials in
Dodge City determined that Komodo dragons, which can grow up to eight feet
long, are not “companion animals” that qualify as pets. This action came to the
city commissioners’ agenda following a municipal court case over a pet
alligator. Realizing their existing list was simply too vague to address all
the possibilities people could come up with, city officials arrived at an
updated list that also outlawed monitor lizards, caimans and anaconda snakes.
Basically, anyone wanting to keep one of these animals was urged to get the
heck out of Dodge.
Another story in the news recently
comes out of Broken Arrow, Okla., where a woman is asking permission to keep a
great red kangaroo that she has nursed to health from a local animal sanctuary,
caring for it much like a child. A healthy animal of this nature can grow up to
seven feet tall, weigh more than 200 pounds and bound 25 feet in a single leap.
But because of his health issues, “Irwin” may not get larger than 50 pounds.
There are some very unique circumstances in this case, which is still being
debated by the Broken Arrow council. But as the city attorney said,
prophetically, “Every exception made sets a precedent.”
I love animals of all kinds. I grew
up on a farm, and have had “companion animals” all my life. I would say,
however, that I prefer the warm, fuzzy kind of pet rather than the cool, slimy,
“scaley” kind, and certainly nothing with more than four legs or no legs at
all. However, I accept and fully understand that everyone has their own
preferences and favorites. But no one has the right to endanger another person
by the company they keep, no matter how “safe” or harmless they think it is.
Laws, ordinances, rules and guidelines are everywhere – whether we like them or
not – not only to protect us from each other, but also to protect us from
ourselves.
No comments:
Post a Comment